Sherrod Brown is back on the campaign trail, and he is placing his political future squarely in the hands of Ohio's organized labor. The 73-year-old Democrat, who spent 32 years in Congress before losing his Senate seat in 2024, is running again in a bid to unseat incumbent Republican Sen. Jon Husted. His comeback strategy centers on the same constituency that helped define his long career: union households and working-class voters.
At the biennial gathering of the Ohio AFL-CIO, Brown received a reception that resembled a homecoming celebration. The event, held in Columbus, drew union members representing steelworkers, utility workers, construction trades and other labor groups. AC/DC's "Thunderstruck" played over the ballroom speakers as Brown worked the room, exchanging handshakes and greetings with supporters who have formed the backbone of his political base for five decades.
Brown's message to the crowd was direct: he needs these union members to serve as his messengers. He urged them to talk to their neighbors, their fellow congregants, their friends at school and in their communities. He specifically highlighted the credibility that tradespeople carry with one another, noting that a pipefitter is more likely to be heard by another pipefitter than a politician ever could be. His appeal rested on a simple premise — that voters trust people they know, and that union members can vouch for his record of fighting for workers throughout his career.
The political landscape Brown faces is markedly different from the one that first sent him to Washington. In 2024, he lost his Senate seat as working-class voters across Ohio and other states shifted toward Donald Trump and Republican candidates. That realignment has reshaped the electoral map in Ohio, a state that once functioned as a bellwether but has trended increasingly Republican in recent cycles. Brown's defeat was part of a broader pattern in which Democrats struggled to retain support among voters without college degrees, particularly in the industrial Midwest.
Now, Brown is testing whether a focused appeal to union households can reverse that trend. His calculation appears to be that organized labor remains a uniquely trusted institution among working-class voters, even as partisan allegiances have shifted. Union members, he argues, can cut through the noise of political advertising and speak with authenticity about a candidate's record. It is a strategy that leans on personal relationships and workplace networks rather than broad-based messaging.
The stakes extend well beyond Ohio. Control of the U.S. Senate is up for grabs, and races in states like Ohio could determine which party holds the majority. Brown's candidacy is one of the most closely watched contests in the country, both because of his national profile and because it will serve as a test of whether Democrats can win back the working-class voters they have lost in recent elections. If Brown succeeds, it could offer a template for other Democrats competing in Republican-leaning states. If he fails, it may reinforce the narrative that the party's connection with blue-collar voters has eroded beyond repair.
Brown's resume is unusual in modern politics. He has held public office for 50 years, including 32 years in the U.S. Congress, where he built a reputation as one of the chamber's most vocal advocates for labor rights, trade policy and workers' wages. He was a frequent critic of free trade agreements that he argued shipped American jobs overseas, and he maintained a distinctly populist economic message that sometimes put him at odds with members of his own party. That history is central to his current pitch, as he reminds voters that his entire career has been oriented around the interests of working people.
His opponent, Sen. Jon Husted, represents a different direction for Ohio. Husted, a Republican, holds the seat after being appointed and will be running as an incumbent with the advantages that entails, including name recognition and the ability to tout his record in the Senate. Republicans have made gains among working-class voters by focusing on cultural issues, energy policy and skepticism of government regulation, arguments that have resonated in communities that once voted reliably Democratic. Brown will need to overcome that shift while also navigating a national political environment that remains deeply polarized.
For union leaders, Brown's candidacy represents both an opportunity and a challenge. Unions have seen their membership numbers decline over decades, and their political influence has been tested by changing demographics and the rise of right-to-work laws in several states. Yet in Ohio, organized labor still represents a substantial voting bloc, particularly in manufacturing-heavy regions like Akron, Cleveland and the Mahoning Valley. Brown's campaign is likely to invest heavily in mobilizing those members, using union halls and phone banks as organizing hubs in the closing weeks of the race.
The congressman's remarks at the AFL-CIO gathering reflected an awareness that he cannot win on his own. He asked union members to share information about his record, to remind their peers of the battles he has fought on their behalf, and to make the case that sending him back to Washington would serve their interests. It was a plea for grassroots advocacy rather than a traditional campaign speech, a recognition that peer-to-peer persuasion may matter more than any television advertisement in a state where voters have grown skeptical of political messaging.
Brown's path to victory depends on whether that appeal can translate into votes. The working-class coalition he once relied on has fractured, with many voters prioritizing issues like immigration, inflation and cultural concerns over traditional labor priorities. To rebuild that coalition, Brown must convince voters that his economic record outweighs their reservations about the national Democratic Party. His focus on union households is a calculated bet that those voters, at least, remain reachable through the networks he has cultivated over a half-century in public life.
The race is expected to draw national attention and significant spending from both parties, given its potential to decide the Senate majority. Outside groups are likely to flood Ohio's airwaves, and both campaigns will work to define the other's record. In that environment, Brown's reliance on union messengers may prove to be either his greatest asset or an insufficient counterweight to broader political forces. Much will depend on turnout, particularly among working-class voters who have drifted away from the Democratic coalition in recent elections.
For now, Brown is pressing forward with the strategy that has defined his career: showing up with union members, speaking their language and asking them to carry his message to their communities. Whether that approach can overcome the headwinds facing Democrats in Ohio will not be known until voters cast their ballots. But the congressman's decision to stake his comeback on the state's labor movement signals that he believes the working-class voters who once sent him to Washington are not yet out of reach — if he can reach them through the people they trust most.
(0)